Pages: 1 [2]   Bas de page
«Imprimer»
Auteur Fil de discussion: great so far  (Lu 466 fois)
zenwick
Forum Member
*

Hors ligne Hors ligne

Messages: 8
Karma: 0


« Répondre #15 le: 23 juin 2010, 10:53:46 »
0

Oh and I'll post this so you know the real going ons with ethanol.  Debunking myths are easy.  Its the politics behind the system thats the problem,  Hence why i am here.  We need to work collectivly because as far as this government is concerned the teleco (bellnexxia) has and always will 0wn the network and you are asking the one question every hacker since the beginning has been fighting for.

http://www.ethanolcollective.com/discussion/topic/show/326381
Concerned Citizen
Forum Member
****

Hors ligne Hors ligne

Localisation: Etobicoke-Lakeshore Riding
Messages: 340
Karma: 21


« Répondre #16 le: 24 juin 2010, 04:19:08 »
0

Electric cars are viable with off the shelf deep-cycle lead-acid batteries (also known as Golf Cart or Marine Batteries) if the individual does not need to drive more than 80-100km a day. Which a vast majority of people do not need more than that. If you watch discovery channel you will know a 16 year old kid did this to a pick-up truck that he uses to drive where he need to go and he did it on his check as a part-time lifeguard. The funny thing is it costs about $0.10 to fill up Smiley much cheaper than gasoline.

I will admit the electric grid probably would have problems but like dealing with Net Neutrality issues this can be fixed and addressed by infrastructure upgrades.

Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.
-James Madison
zenwick
Forum Member
*

Hors ligne Hors ligne

Messages: 8
Karma: 0


« Répondre #17 le: 24 juin 2010, 11:26:52 »
0

Electric cars are viable with off the shelf deep-cycle lead-acid batteries (also known as Golf Cart or Marine Batteries) if the individual does not need to drive more than 80-100km a day. Which a vast majority of people do not need more than that. If you watch discovery channel you will know a 16 year old kid did this to a pick-up truck that he uses to drive where he need to go and he did it on his check as a part-time lifeguard. The funny thing is it costs about $0.10 to fill up Smiley much cheaper than gasoline.

The funny thing is that it only costs 10c a liter to fill up with ethanol.  If one makes it themselves the price is even cheaper. Its a great alternative combined with electrical infrastructure upgrades.  Currently with the price of electricity and TOU rates which will rise (after all we still have the old government) electricity it will add another 100 to the bill since the batter will have difficulty in holding the charge for any given point of time.  It looses power regardless of use.  While a person did electrify his car this is not a viable solution for everyone.  Most people I know do drive past 100km a day as they not only commute as the current job market demands, but there is added pressure of live such as needing the car for transportation for families, food and other requirements.  Keep in mind also that these off the shelf batteries are also not environmentally friendly.  We are talking about acid which needs special care when recycling and there is the added cost of maintenance since said battery is going to use power which otherwise an alternator would take pressure off of.  Because of this it can cause massive faults as the voltages changes. Especially true when winter rolls around and the reasons electric cars are simply not safe on our highways.  Adding to that is when an accident does occur emergency personnel have to be careful not to be shocked.  I agree electric "golf" cart cars such as very small micro cars along with scooters makes good sense along with not having to have a license fee that pertain to them as long as the speed and voltage is caped. 

With people living in the city and not needing to go far then sure.  But as far as your typical house hold family need of transportation then ethanol becomes a viable alternative. 

Citation
I will admit the electric grid probably would have problems but like dealing with Net Neutrality issues this can be fixed and addressed by infrastructure upgrades.

Agree, but unlike the issue with net neutrality where the infrastructure is already in place and upgraded it is not so easy with electricity.  As a form of energy it is currently as expensive or sometimes more so than gasoline.  I can at least park my car in the odd times.  I cannot turn off my fridge.  So what do I do?
Thom Corbett
Forum Member
*

Power to the people, not the government.
Hors ligne Hors ligne

Localisation: Nova Scotia
Messages: 31
Karma: 2


« Répondre #18 le: 24 juin 2010, 03:04:37 »
+1

On getting rid of military.

Living in a military town (Greenwood, Nova Scotia) and one of the few family members who didn't join the military, I have a few views on "getting rid of the military. What we should get back to, in my view, is a solely "peacekeeping" force, which means we would never have gotten involved in Afghanistan. Many members of the military know that we are over their for U.S. corporate interests (and some don't care), but most of them are only there because they are military and go where they are ordered. For the most part. However, as Peace Keepers, you won't hear any complaints about this option. And it should be enshrined at all levels of the military, starting from the top.
Mikkel Paulson
Party Leader
PPCA Representative
*

Hors ligne Hors ligne

Localisation: Edmonton
Messages: 982
Karma: 18


WWW
« Répondre #19 le: 26 juin 2010, 12:13:43 »
0

Absolutely. Whatever happened to the Canadian Forces directed by principles, building not destroying, defending not killing? We need someone with Pearson's vision at the helm.
zenwick
Forum Member
*

Hors ligne Hors ligne

Messages: 8
Karma: 0


« Répondre #20 le: 26 juin 2010, 02:40:16 »
0

On getting rid of military.

Living in a military town (Greenwood, Nova Scotia) and one of the few family members who didn't join the military, I have a few views on "getting rid of the military. What we should get back to, in my view, is a solely "peacekeeping" force, which means we would never have gotten involved in Afghanistan. Many members of the military know that we are over their for U.S. corporate interests (and some don't care), but most of them are only there because they are military and go where they are ordered. For the most part. However, as Peace Keepers, you won't hear any complaints about this option. And it should be enshrined at all levels of the military, starting from the top.


I apologize for not getting back to you.  I've been caught up not only by work but local politics as they are proposing something thats quite stiupid which is why I believe that this party must make head way and it may be a long shot it beats the heck out of the current choices in Canada.   

Thom Corbett Thats exactly it!  We need our military and we need them home.  We had a earth quake and tornado's just these past couple of days and we need them here just in case.
Pages: 1 [2]   Haut de page
«Imprimer»
 
Aller à: