Pages: 1 [2]   Bas de page
«Imprimer»
Auteur Fil de discussion: Informing the uninformed. Is rhetoric enoguh?  (Lu 305 fois)
acerix
Forum Member
*

Hors ligne Hors ligne

Localisation: Ottawa
Messages: 7
Karma: 0


« Répondre #15 le: 24 ao�t 2010, 12:24:36 »
0

Sure. That doesn't mean it's important enough to our platform to advertise. Let's keep it political.

Patent reform is a big part of the platform, and that would immensely help the open source community and therefore widespread adoption, well at least in Canada.  I've seen too many free projects, hindered by software patents: MP3 encoding is a major example, DVD decryption I think is also affected.

Right now, if someone install say Ubuntu, probably the easiest open source OS to install, there are many components that cannot be enabled by default. DVD decryption, some drivers (3D video, wifi), and I know there is lots more in those 'restricted' repositories. 

Patent reform would give Ubuntu the freedom to install all the components that people expect to be included in their OS and protect the organizers from lawsuits. Although, I really can't tell how much good a purely Canadian law will do since most software projects are not based here (well maybe that will change if we don't recognize software patents)
Blyss+
Invité
« Répondre #16 le: 24 ao�t 2010, 02:44:41 »
0

Far as I can tell...Canadian reform wouldn't do much for the drivers etc involved in some of the issues I also have with open Source OSes.

However...it only takes one country to start a trend.( I do firmly believe this.)

When other ordinary folks are made aware for what's possible...to me, this is a HUGE part of why I will be voting pirate, and why I encourage my family, colleagues, and peers to do so.
Mikkel Paulson
Party Leader
PPCA Representative
*

Hors ligne Hors ligne

Localisation: Edmonton
Messages: 982
Karma: 18


WWW
« Répondre #17 le: 24 ao�t 2010, 05:36:07 »
0

Patent reform is a big part of the platform, and that would immensely help the open source community and therefore widespread adoption, well at least in Canada.  I've seen too many free projects, hindered by software patents: MP3 encoding is a major example, DVD decryption I think is also affected.

Right now, if someone install say Ubuntu, probably the easiest open source OS to install, there are many components that cannot be enabled by default. DVD decryption, some drivers (3D video, wifi), and I know there is lots more in those 'restricted' repositories. 

Patent reform would give Ubuntu the freedom to install all the components that people expect to be included in their OS and protect the organizers from lawsuits. Although, I really can't tell how much good a purely Canadian law will do since most software projects are not based here (well maybe that will change if we don't recognize software patents)

An excellent point. Patent and anti-circumvention laws are indeed hurting the open source community, but they're only one example among many. It's certainly something that bears mention when talking about the restrictive effects of these laws, but still not something that I can see being included in our platform proper. Undecided
Mephisto13
Forum Member
*

Hors ligne Hors ligne

Localisation: Gatineau, Quebec
Messages: 1
Karma: 0


« Répondre #18 le: 25 ao�t 2010, 01:22:07 »
0

The focus of this discussion has been mostly on patents and copyright reform.

While I know that this is a big part of what we stand for, the media have almost exclusively bashed on pirates for stealing music, movies, software, etc which has generated instant negative emotions attached to that word : pirates (which is why I love that T-shirt idea with only our acronym on the front with what we stand for on the backs, get people asking what's the T-shirt stands for, get them to talk). And no matter how much we can try, it is difficult to show the general non-tech savvy population the truth, to open their minds, to show them that we are being taken for a ride, that people who are working on these reforms are sponsored by corporations that don't want to adapt to this new information age but would rather like to tenuously hang on to their dying cash cow. So why not start by promoting something that affects the general population directly. When you are or can be directly affected, you tend to tune in and absorb information, gain as much information in order to protect yourself.

What about Privacy.

Everyone hears about Facebook and their privacy settings and how hard it is to opt out, or in. It's a difficult process and it confuses people. Then you hear about a comprehensive list that a company compiled of all sorts of free private information found in Facebook. I also heard about this poor little 11 yr-old girl that the internet just virtually "beat up", posting personal information, cell phone number, home number, address, etc. Scary stuff!! But it just goes to show people how easy it is to lose your private information. And once it's out there...you can't get it back!

Add to that the constant fear that your credit card information will be stolen, or the discovery that someone took out a loan in your name, etc. This fear permeates within our society. And by no means do I want to prey on these fears, but if we stood as champions of privacy, people might start to notice. If they notice, they start to hear. And if you hear, you start to listen and when you're at that stage, people generally have an open mind (or want an intelligent debate on the subject...well, usually anyway).

Privacy is extremely important, especially in this day and age. I find people are giving away private information way too freely, without fear or regard of the consequences. I don't want to star promoting paranoia where everyone keeps everything close to their vests, but if people are informed about the importance of protecting one's privacy, then they can make proper decisions with their own personal info.

In turn, we could educate about open government (speak about the Access to Information Act, maybe even get it reformed! it hasn't really been reformed since it's integration in 1983 - again, how can one vote without being informed about what's happening within our government?), net neutrality, copyright and patent reform.

All these things are intertwined with each other, even more so with ever evolving technology. Technology has advanced so quickly and with giant leaps that I think people have a hard time keeping up. For instance, our parents played Pac Man. Pac Man at an arcade!! Pac Man was the king of the crop of video games barely 30 years ago! Now you can play Pac Man on your iPod.

Most of the population use these devices without knowing the dangers that come with it. Not because they don't know any better, I tend to think that it's because no one has taken the time to explain to people how you can protect your privacy. The media would rather play on your fears than educate you. It sells papers.

So why don't we educate?

I don't have any ideas yet, I simply wanted to change the sole focus from copyright and patents to other important things that we are also in favour of.
« Dernière édition: 25 ao�t 2010, 01:32:50 par Mephisto13 »

Jason - ATIP Analyst
*Making movies, making songs and fighting 'round the world.*
--"With your shield or on it!" - old spartan saying
--"All you bases are belong to us" - The internets
--"Pretty much all the honest truth telling in the world is done by children." - Oliver Wendell Holmes
Pages: 1 [2]   Haut de page
«Imprimer»
 
Aller à: