Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Bas de page
«Imprimer»
Auteur Fil de discussion: How about lending a hand to Wikileaks?  (Lu 666 fois)
Mikkel Paulson
Party Leader
PPCA Representative
*

Hors ligne Hors ligne

Localisation: Edmonton
Messages: 982
Karma: 18


WWW
« Répondre #45 le: 9 d�cembre 2010, 10:21:51 »
0

Citation de: Canada Elections Act

Deregistration

Notice to party

521.1 (1) If the Commissioner has reasonable grounds to suspect that a registered party does not have as one of its fundamental purposes participating in public affairs by endorsing one or more of its members as candidates and supporting their election, the Commissioner shall, in writing, notify the party that it is required to show that that is one of its fundamental purposes.


Court application

(2) If, after giving the party a reasonable opportunity to show what its fundamental purposes are, the Commissioner still has reasonable grounds to suspect that the party does not have as one of its fundamental purposes the purpose described in subsection (1), the Commissioner may apply to a court described in subsection 525(1) for an order described in subsection (3).


Order

(3) If the court is satisfied that the party does not have as one of its fundamental purposes the purpose described in subsection (1), the court shall, by order, direct the Chief Electoral Officer to deregister the party and it may

(a) direct the chief agent — or another person specified by the court — to liquidate the party’s assets; and

(b) if it directs liquidation under paragraph (a), direct the financial agent of each registered association — or another person specified by the court — to liquidate the registered association’s assets.


Onus on party

(4) The onus of satisfying the court that one of its fundamental purposes is the purpose described in subsection (1) is on the party.


Factors

(5) In making its decision, the court shall consider all of the factors relevant to determining the party’s purposes, including, as applicable, the following:

(a) the party’s constitution, articles of incorporation, letters patent or by-laws or any other information that may indicate those purposes;

(b) the party’s political program, annual report to members, fundraising plan, advertising material and policy statements;

(c) the nature and extent of the activities of the party and its registered associations and candidates, including the nature and extent of their involvement in electoral campaigns and any of their public statements in support of another political party or a candidate of another political party;

(d) the funds received by the party and its registered associations and candidates, their sources and how they are used by the party, including as election expenses;

(e) interactions of the party with other entities that are not recognized political parties under the laws of any province that may indicate that it is under the control, direct or indirect, of another entity or that the party is using its status as a registered party primarily for the purpose of providing financial assistance to another entity; and

(f) whether the party is a non-profit entity.


Exemption

(6) If, in the court’s opinion, the public interest and the need to ensure fairness of the electoral process warrant it, the court may, on application, exempt the party and its registered associations from the application of subsection 127(3.3) of the Income Tax Act. If an exemption is granted, the court may impose any conditions on the activities of the party, registered association or candidate that it considers appropriate.


Liquidation

(7) If a chief agent, a financial agent or a person specified by the court is, under subsection (3), directed to liquidate, they shall carry out the liquidation in accordance with subsections 501(4) to (7).

2004, c. 24, s. 23.


Referring to the full Act (338 pages) rather than the summary document provided to political parties (74 pages), it seems that you're right about the notification process. I'd rather not start down that road, but the risk is apparently not as great as I'd anticipated.
Joshua Doucet
Forum Member
**

Hors ligne Hors ligne

Messages: 55
Karma: 1


« Répondre #46 le: 9 d�cembre 2010, 11:45:56 »
0

I am very glad you took the time to find that Mikkel. Thank you.
Biogrand
Forum Member
***

Hors ligne Hors ligne

Messages: 130
Karma: -2


« Répondre #47 le: 10 d�cembre 2010, 01:31:06 »
0

.........So we're safe as long as we endorse at least candidate with the financial records and 250+ membership?

When confronted with a problem: an open-minded person would first observe, analysis and act with a strategy solve to the problem.
However, a close-minded person would retort to brute force, tantrums and even hysterias when confronted with a problems
Joshua Doucet
Forum Member
**

Hors ligne Hors ligne

Messages: 55
Karma: 1


« Répondre #48 le: 10 d�cembre 2010, 01:49:15 »
0

.........So we're safe as long as we endorse at least candidate with the financial records and 250+ membership?

Essentially yes. And if we are wrong we will be warned no shut down overnight.
Mikkel Paulson
Party Leader
PPCA Representative
*

Hors ligne Hors ligne

Localisation: Edmonton
Messages: 982
Karma: 18


WWW
« Répondre #49 le: 10 d�cembre 2010, 01:52:22 »
0

There are a number of other requirements, mostly in terms of information about the party that has to be reported, but the important part on this subject is what we can't do, not what we have to do.
Biogrand
Forum Member
***

Hors ligne Hors ligne

Messages: 130
Karma: -2


« Répondre #50 le: 10 d�cembre 2010, 02:28:28 »
0

But when RCMP raided the Conservative HQ and found that they spend over the election spending limit by 1 million dollars, Election Canada didn't even deregistered them for doing so. So I guess spending over the limit by 1 million dollars is not enough for deregistration of a party.

When confronted with a problem: an open-minded person would first observe, analysis and act with a strategy solve to the problem.
However, a close-minded person would retort to brute force, tantrums and even hysterias when confronted with a problems
Mikkel Paulson
Party Leader
PPCA Representative
*

Hors ligne Hors ligne

Localisation: Edmonton
Messages: 982
Karma: 18


WWW
« Répondre #51 le: 10 d�cembre 2010, 02:42:08 »
0

No. Exceeding the spending limit involves fines; exceeding the donation limit requires excess to be turned over to the Receiver General. Either one done regularly/systematically could result in deregistration, although no doubt the big parties would be subject to a different standard than the rest of us.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]   Haut de page
«Imprimer»
 
Aller à: